In this article9
- 1.What is n8n, and why is everyone talking about it?
- 2.n8n vs Zapier vs Make: pricing compared
- 3.The n8n license: read this before you build on it
- 4.Which is better: n8n, Make or Zapier?
- 5.When does custom automation win?
- 6.A mixed approach often works best
- 7.Frequently asked questions
- 8.Next steps
- 9.Sources
In the n8n vs Zapier debate, the key difference is how you pay: Zapier charges per task (every action counts), Make charges per credit (every module action counts) and n8n charges per workflow execution, no matter how many steps it contains. That makes n8n cheaper for long, multi-step workflows and gives you the option to self-host, while Zapier is the easiest to use and has the largest catalog of ready-made integrations. Custom-built automation wins once a process is business-critical, full of exceptions or handles sensitive data.
The short version:
- The billing models differ fundamentally: Zapier counts tasks, Make counts credits, n8n counts full workflow executions.
- Self-hosted n8n is free, but its Sustainable Use License only allows internal business use. Reselling it or embedding it in your own product requires a commercial agreement.
- No-code shines for linear flows between two or three apps. Heavy branching, error handling and testability are where it starts to hurt.
- Custom automation costs more to build, but there is no per-execution fee and you own the code.
What is n8n, and why is everyone talking about it?
n8n is a workflow automation platform where you connect blocks, called nodes, into workflows. A trigger (a new email, a webhook, a schedule) kicks off a chain of actions in other systems. Compared with Zapier and Make, n8n lets you self-host, drop custom JavaScript or Python into a workflow, and use extensive AI nodes for working with language models and agents.
The company is growing fast. In October 2025 n8n raised $180 million at a $2.5 billion valuation. In May 2026 SAP made a strategic investment at a $5.2 billion valuation and is building n8n into Joule Studio, its environment for building agents. n8n reports more than 1,400 enterprise customers, 1.7 million monthly active developers and builders, and more than 1,000 integrations.
That growth is good news for the platform's longevity. It says nothing about whether n8n is the right fit for your process.
n8n vs Zapier vs Make: pricing compared
Prices as of September 2026, taken from each vendor's pricing page. Amounts vary by currency and monthly versus annual billing, so check them before you decide.
| Platform | Free | Entry | Mid | Business | Billing unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n8n (cloud) | Self-host (Community Edition) | Starter: $20/mo, 2,500 executions | Pro: $50/mo, 10,000 executions | Business: EUR 667/mo, 40,000 executions | Per workflow execution |
| Make | 1,000 credits/mo | Core: $12/mo, 10,000 credits | Pro: $21/mo | Teams: $38/mo | Per module action (credit) |
| Zapier | 100 tasks/mo | Professional: from $19.99/mo | Team: from $69/mo | Enterprise: on request | Per successful action (task) |
Entry prices are close. The real difference is how usage is counted.
Worked example: one workflow with ten steps
Say you have a workflow that performs nine actions for every new order: look up the customer, create the order in your ERP, check stock, queue an invoice, send an email, and so on. It runs 1,000 times a month.
- Zapier: every successful action is a task; polling for new data doesn't count. That's roughly 9 x 1,000 = 9,000 tasks a month.
- Make: every module action costs a credit. Also roughly 9,000 to 10,000 credits a month, more if you use Make AI features that cost more than one credit.
- n8n: one execution per order, so 1,000 executions a month regardless of step count.
With two-step workflows the difference is small. With long workflows full of steps, loops or branches, n8n's model is clearly cheaper. Add AI steps and you pay the language model provider on top, whichever platform you use.
The n8n license: read this before you build on it
This is the point most comparisons skip. n8n is not open source in the classic sense. The self-hosted edition falls under the Sustainable Use License, which n8n calls "fair-code": the source is available, but commercial use is restricted.
According to n8n's own documentation:
- You may use and modify n8n for free for internal business purposes or non-commercial and personal use.
- You may only distribute it or make it available to others free of charge and for non-commercial purposes.
- Anything else, such as embedding n8n in a product you sell or offering paid workflows on your n8n instance, requires a separate commercial agreement with n8n.
For a company automating its own operations, that's not an issue. For a software company or agency wanting to ship n8n inside a customer-facing product, it is. Get it reviewed before you build on it.
Which is better: n8n, Make or Zapier?
It depends on who builds the automations and what they automate.
| Criterion | Zapier | Make | n8n | Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning curve | Lowest | Medium | Higher, more technical | Requires developers |
| Ready-made integrations | Very large | Large | Large (1,000+) | Built via APIs |
| Cost at many steps | Climbs fast | Climbs | Favorable | No per-run fee |
| Self-hosting (data stays with you) | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Custom code in the flow | Limited | Limited | Yes | Full |
| Version control, tests, code review | Limited | Limited | Limited | Full |
| Ownership | Platform | Platform | Platform (license) | You own the code |
A rule of thumb:
- Zapier when non-technical colleagues want to build simple connections themselves and volume is low.
- Make when you want to build visually with a bit more logic at a low price per credit.
- n8n when you are technical, run long workflows or AI steps, or want data to stay in your own environment.
And no, Zapier doesn't run on n8n under the hood. They are separate, competing platforms.
When does custom automation win?
No-code and low-code platforms are great up to a point. That point usually arrives when one or more of these apply:
- The process is critical. If an error means a wrong invoice, a double payment or a missed order, you want automated tests, code review and version control. That's hard in a visual editor.
- There are many exceptions. Ten branches for customer types, return rules and currencies quickly become unreadable as a visual flow.
- Multiple systems with their own quirks. Rate limits, pagination, expiring tokens and error codes from ERP and accounting systems need serious error handling. More on that in ERP integration automation.
- Volume grows. Paying per task or credit is cheap at hundreds of actions and noticeable at hundreds of thousands.
- You handle sensitive data. Then you want to know exactly where data lives, who can access it and what gets logged.
- It becomes part of your product. With n8n you hit the license; with the others you hit vendor dependency.
Custom doesn't mean building everything from scratch. A good custom solution uses existing libraries, the official APIs of your systems and a language model where needed, but in code you can test and that belongs to you. The build cost versus running cost trade-off is covered in custom software development cost.
A mixed approach often works best
In practice you rarely pick just one. Many companies let colleagues build simple connections in Zapier or Make, use n8n for internal workflows with AI steps, and have core processes like order handling or invoicing built as custom software. What matters is keeping track of which automations run where and who owns them. Otherwise, two years from now you'll have forty flows nobody understands. For a method to decide which process gets which route, see our business process automation guide.
Frequently asked questions
Is n8n free?
The self-hosted n8n Community Edition is free for internal business use and non-commercial use under the Sustainable Use License, though you pay for your own hosting and maintenance. The cloud version starts at $20 per month for 2,500 workflow executions (prices as of September 2026).
Which is better, n8n or Zapier?
Zapier is easier for non-technical users and has the most ready-made integrations. n8n is more flexible, can be self-hosted and is often cheaper for long workflows because it charges per execution rather than per action. The right choice depends on your team's technical skills and how many steps your workflows have.
Does Zapier use n8n?
No. Zapier and n8n are separate, competing workflow automation platforms with their own technology and pricing. Zapier is a hosted-only service, while n8n can also be self-hosted.
What is better than Zapier?
That depends on what you need. For long workflows with many steps, Make and n8n are often cheaper because Zapier counts every action as a task. For critical processes with many exceptions and sensitive data, custom automation is easier to test and control.
Next steps
Not sure whether your process fits a no-code tool or deserves a custom build? Take the free AI scan for a first assessment. Airflows builds custom automation where you own the code and data, and we'll tell you honestly when a no-code tool will do. See our services for how we work.
Sources
- n8n: n8n raises $180m to get AI closer to value with orchestration (October 9, 2025)
- PR Newswire via Yahoo Finance: n8n valuation doubles to $5.2bn as SAP makes strategic investment (May 12, 2026)
- n8n: Plans and Pricing (accessed September 26, 2026)
- n8n Docs: Sustainable Use License (accessed September 26, 2026)
- Make: Pricing & Subscription Packages (accessed September 26, 2026)
- Zapier: Plans & Pricing (accessed September 26, 2026)

Builds AI agents, automations and custom software for businesses at Airflows.



